In Praise of Chocolate Fountains

 

Photo Credit: Fox
Photo Credit: Fox

Mindy Kaling—like Lena Dunham, Beyoncé, and Michelle Obama—is one of my pretend best friends. I imagine us sitting around my apartment discussing the status of women in the entertainment industry, the end of the payroll tax holiday, and whether the genetic mingling of Kardashian and Kanye will produce a baby far cuter than the soon-to-be third-in-line to the House of Windsor. (The answer is yes.) I was subsequently predisposed to like The Mindy Project well before it aired—even taking into account its remarkably awful title. The pilot did not disappoint—with Kaling inhabiting her intelligent ditz persona while interweaving light comedy with subtly dark material. But then the actual season began and not only did the show’s setting inexplicably shift from Los Angeles to a NYC-soundstage housed in Los Angeles but the show’s edge—and Mindy’s voice—were decidedly blunted. There are so many questions raised by the first few episodes. Did the producers hope to appeal to a broader audience with a hyper-saturated lighting design brought to you by the 1990s? Does having a woman of color create and star in a show preclude the inclusion of any other non-white people? (Have you ever entered a doctor’s office and seen only white people? No, you have not.) Are the sitcom clichés and cardboard side characters really just meta-commentaries on the state of the modern romantic comedy? Perhaps, but I think it’s more likely that The Mindy Project just isn’t very good. Continue reading “In Praise of Chocolate Fountains”

Modern Family, You Say?

Photo credit: Orchard Cove Photography
Photo Credit: Orchard Cove Photography

During a recent conversation with a colleague about Working Girl and Baby Boom—two iconic eighties films documenting the movement of women into the workplace—I questioned whether popular culture has progressed from these depictions of tennis-shoe-clad secretaries shuffling to midtown in two-piece suits. If we are to believe the, invariably male, writers of network sitcoms, it would appear that mothers have long ago retired those power suits in exchange for 1950s gender ideals. There would be nothing wrong with network television featuring stay-at-home moms if these comedies also showcased at least a few working mothers and stay-at-home dads. But … alas … network sitcoms appear to be in a Mad Men time warp despite demographic changes, the growth of female-headed households, and dire recent warnings about the coming end of men. Popular culture has no problem featuring single working women. Granted, these women usually spend 95% of their time talking about men, but I spent approximately three hours yesterday dissecting a recent relationship, so perhaps I’m not the best feminist to pass judgment here. Although women clearly can still “make it after all” on television, this only remains true until they get a ring on their finger and enter the delivery room. One can always point out exceptions like Up All Night (which I’ll admit, I’ve never seen), but, in most cases, network comedies remain particularly loathe to feature modern, shifting parental roles. Which brings me to Modern Family. Continue reading “Modern Family, You Say?”

The Ascent of the Vag

Photo credit: McCarter Theatre
Photo credit: McCarter Theatre

I realize few people reading this are going to be able to make it out to Stony Point, NY to see the newest production of Sarah Treem’s play “The How and the Why,” but the Times’ review should encourage all you New Yorkers to hop on a train for Westchester. I normally despise evolutionary biology because I can only read so many books written by pseudo or somewhat legitimate scientists who attempt to explain all gender difference with the oh-so-convincing “But that’s what the cavemen did” argument. Why do men cheat? Because early man needed to spread his seed. Why do women often become attached after sex? Because it behooved early woman to attach herself to one strong mate. Why do girls overanalyze text messages? I’m sure it has something to do with early woman and her need to know which man would provide her with the best dead moose. Basically, 99% of this reasoning is ridiculous and seems based on scientists watching The Clan of the Cave Bear too many times on AMC. But this doesn’t stop some men (and it’s mostly men) from blaming all their flaws on our hominid ancestors as though evolution somehow provides a classier, scientific version of the it-wasn’t-me-it-was-my-penis defense. Continue reading “The Ascent of the Vag”

Cruel Intentions

Photo Credit: Gary Sanchez Productions
Photo Credit: Gary Sanchez Productions

Remember how critics described Bridesmaids as a game-changing, female-centric, raunchy manifesto of a woman’s right to behave badly on screen? While I truly enjoyed how Bridesmaids featured women with flaws greater than a propensity for falling down, the film was still relatively tame and—outside of the poop, anal bleaching, and penis impersonations—a classic romantic comedy with a happy ending that even included the standard cute Irish fellow. None of the women behaved that badly or produced meltdowns that approximated normal female behavior. Don’t get me wrong: I really liked Bridesmaids, and I realize it was never meant to be a dark film. But critics acted as though it was an accurate depiction of girls gone bad. Twenty minutes into a viewing of Bachelorette and I began to think, “ah … so this is the film critics imagined when they were watching Bridesmaids.” Not only is writer/director Leslye Headland’s Bachelorette decidedly darker but it is also a much more poignant look at female self-destruction.

Although I’m not a massive bitch and barely drink, I get the girls of Bachelorette—self-absorbed, troubled women on the cusp of 30, who characterize men using the classic Krakow/Catalano taxonomy and treat their bodies either with complete disregard or like unruly children in need of strict discipline. Most of the titular bachelorettes can’t quite transition into adulthood (i.e., your classic Apatovian fault), but they also exhibit more specifically female flaws: they use sex for validation, talk about their friends behind their backs, and, most significantly, despise their own bodies. In short, they behave like a lot of women I know. Continue reading “Cruel Intentions”

The Role of Edith Wharton Will Now Be Played by a Supermodel

 

Photo credit: Annie Leibovitz for Vogue
Photo credit: Annie Leibovitz for Vogue

Slate explains why no female writers could be used in Vogue’s recent Edith Wharton tribute spread. Obviously, female writers are all monsters who must hide behind their book jackets for fear that someone might spot their visible pores and burn them at the stake. Even though Wharton wasn’t considered attractive (yet somehow managed to live a rich life) and was well into her forties before she achieved true literary success, she must be impersonated by a twenty-something supermodel. This makes perfect sense. I do enjoy Eugenides rocking the bowler hat though.